When a Will Is Drafted but Not Signed: What a Recent WA Supreme Court Decision Means for Grieving Families

June 4, 2026

A 2026 Supreme Court of Western Australia decision shows that, in the right circumstances, a draft will that was never signed can still be admitted to probate. If your loved one died before signing their will, all may not be lost.


A common - and heartbreaking - situation

Families regularly come to us with the same painful story. A loved one knew exactly what they wanted to do with their estate. They saw a solicitor. A will was drafted. They read it, told the family they were happy with it, and arranged to come back and sign. Then, before that appointment could happen, they died.


The natural assumption is that, because the will was never signed, it is worthless and the law will treat the deceased as having died intestate. That assumption is often wrong.


What the Supreme Court decided

In a decision delivered on 2 June 2026 (Te Paa v Evans [2026] WASC 214), the Supreme Court of Western Australia granted probate of an unsigned draft will - a will that existed only as a PDF attachment on the deceased's locked iPhone.


The deceased, a man in his early thirties, had given clear instructions to a solicitor in January 2023. He wanted everything to go equally to his four brothers and his mother to act as executor. The solicitor emailed him the draft will in early February. He opened it, read it, told his mother, his stepfather and one of his brothers separately that he was happy with it, and made arrangements to come in and sign. A week later, he died unexpectedly.


The original PDF could not be retrieved. The iPhone was locked, the laptop's storage drive had gone missing, and a digital forensics expert was unable to recover the document. The deceased's father opposed the application and argued his son had died intestate - which would have given him a substantial share of a multi-million dollar estate.


The Court disagreed. Justice Whitby granted probate in solemn form of the solicitor's copy of the draft will, limited until the original is found.


Why the result matters

Section 32 of the Wills Act 1970 (WA) allows the Supreme Court to dispense with the formal requirements for signing a will where the Court is satisfied the deceased intended the document to operate as their will. Combined with the Court's long-standing power to admit a copy of a lost will to probate, this means an unsigned draft can - in the right circumstances - still carry legal effect.


The case confirms several practical points that matter to families:

  • A digital document on a phone or laptop can qualify as a "will" for the purposes of the legislation.
  • A solicitor's draft, never signed by the deceased, can be admitted to probate where the evidence shows the deceased had settled on its terms.
  • The fact that the deceased intended to come back and sign a printed copy does not, on its own, prevent the draft from operating as the will.
  • Where the original cannot be produced - including because it is locked inside an inaccessible device - the Court can grant probate of a copy.


What evidence makes the difference

These applications are won and lost on evidence. The Court has to be satisfied, on clear and convincing material, that:

  • there is a document recording the deceased's testamentary intentions;
  • the deceased had settled on those intentions and did not want further changes;
  • the deceased intended that document to operate as their will; and
  • if the original is missing, it has not been deliberately destroyed by the deceased.

In the recent decision, the evidence that tipped the balance was straightforward: the solicitor's file notes and draft, consistent affidavits from family members who had spoken with the deceased in the days before his death, and an independent digital forensics report explaining why the original could not be retrieved.


If you are in a similar situation, preserving evidence now matters. Do not delete emails or text messages. Keep notes of conversations you had with the deceased about their will. Do not factory-reset phones, laptops or tablets. Do not throw out paperwork from the deceased's solicitor.


How Biddulph & Turley can help

We act for executors, family members and beneficiaries across Western Australia in contested and uncontested probate matters, including:

  • applications to admit informal, unsigned or lost wills under section 32 of the Wills Act 1970 (WA);
  • applications for letters of administration where there is no valid will;
  • disputes between family members about the validity or terms of a will; and
  • family provision claims under the Family Provision Act 1972 (WA).

These matters can feel overwhelming, particularly while you are still grieving. Our role is to take the legal weight off your shoulders, work out quickly whether a section 32 application is realistic on the facts, and guide you through the process from beginning to end.


Talk to us

If a family member has died leaving a draft, unsigned or partially completed will - or no document at all that you can find - contact our office for a confidential, no-obligation discussion.


Biddulph & Turley

Level 3, Suite 6, Bowman Street, South Perth WA

Telephone: (08) 9398 5533

Email: enquiries@wafamilylaw.com.au

Web: biddulphturley.com.au


This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every estate is different and outcomes depend on the specific facts and evidence available.

Close-up of a probate sign on a stack of papers and a wooden gavel.
July 21, 2026
How long do probates in Perth take? Learn the WA Supreme Court timeline, common delays, and capped-fee help from Biddulph & Turley. Call now on 08 9398 5533.
Gavel resting on a “Living Will” document in dim light
May 29, 2026
Will changed late in life under pressure? Learn the grounds to challenge a will in WA and why you must act before probate. Call Biddulph & Turley.
Will Contest book beside a gavel, scales, and gold pen on a desk
May 29, 2026
Brother contesting the will? Learn your rights as a beneficiary under the Family Provision Act in WA and how to respond. Call Biddulph & Turley.
May 29, 2026
Received a Family Provision Act claim as executor? Learn why to hold off distributing the estate and how to protect yourself. Call Biddulph & Turley.
Man standing by a window in a light checkered shirt, looking out with his reflection visible in the glass
May 29, 2026
Father left everything to a new partner? Learn how Family Provision Act claims work in WA and the six month time limit. Call Biddulph & Turley today.
September 22, 2025
Case Summary: When a Note Isn’t a Will Imagine this scenario: After a loved one passes away, a note is discovered—perhaps on their phone, in a drawer, or scribbled on a piece of paper. The note sets out some wishes about who should inherit their assets. Family members hope this note will be accepted as the person’s will. But when the matter goes to court, the judge decides the note is not a valid will. This situation is more common than many realize. In a recent case, a note titled “Last Will” was found on the deceased’s phone. While it expressed some intentions about distributing the estate, the court refused to accept it as an “informal will.” Why? In the case of Gallotti v Galotti-Brown [2025] WASC 384 a handwritten ‘amendment’ was written on a duly executed will. Was this amendment part of the will? Why the Note Was Not Accepted Australian law (and the law in many other places) allows courts to accept a document as an “informal will” even if it doesn’t meet all the usual requirements (like being signed and witnessed). But the court must be convinced of three things: There is a document. The document sets out the person’s testamentary intentions (what they want to happen to their property after death). Most importantly: The person intended the document to operate as their will. In the case above, the court found that the note was more of a draft or a statement of wishes—not a final, operative will. There was no evidence the deceased intended the note to be their last will and testament. The absence of a signature, witnesses, or any indication that the note was meant to be final all counted against it. The Dangers of Informal Wills Relying on informal documents—like notes, emails, or unsent text messages—to express your final wishes is risky. Here’s why: Uncertainty: Courts may not accept the document, leaving your estate to be distributed according to the law, not your wishes. Family Disputes: Ambiguous or informal documents can lead to costly and stressful legal battles among loved ones. Delay and Expense: Proving an informal will is often more complicated, time-consuming, and expensive than preparing a formal will. How to Protect Your Wishes Make a Formal Will: The safest way to ensure your wishes are followed is to make a formal will, properly signed and witnessed. Review Regularly: Update your will as your circumstances change. Seek Legal Advice: A qualified lawyer can help you avoid pitfalls and ensure your will is valid. Don’t leave your legacy to chance. A simple note may not be enough—take the time to make a proper will and give your loved ones certainty and peace of mind.
Close-up of a hand holding a pen.
August 21, 2025
For expert advice on updating wills in Perth, contact Biddulph and Turley today. Visit our website to learn more.
Smiling female lawyer and senior couple going through will
June 25, 2025
Discover how to choose the right executor for your will in Perth, WA. Click here for essential tips and guidance from the experts at Biddulph & Turley.
June 11, 2025
In recent years, the rise of technology has made it easier than ever to create, store, and even amend important documents like wills. Many people assume they can simply jot down their wishes on their phone or leave a note in a digital app, believing this to be sufficient for estate planning. However, legal cases such as Peek v Wheatley [2025] NSWSC 554 highlight the dangers of informal, unprofessional will-making—especially when using a device like an iPhone. The Case at a Glance In Peek v Wheatley, the court examined whether a note found on the late Colin Peek’s iPhone could be considered a valid informal will under the NSW Succession Act 2006. The note, titled ‘Last Will of Colin L. Peek,’ was discovered after his death, and it appeared to specify how his estate should be distributed—primarily passing significant assets to a friend and executor, Mr Wheatley. However, the court faced the challenge of determining whether this digital note truly represented Colin’s testamentary intention—that is, whether it was his clear, deliberate wish to dispose of his estate as stated, with the intention for it to have immediate legal effect. When Will a Document Be Accepted as an Informal Will? In most Australian States, a document that does not meet the formal requirements of a will (such as being signed and witnessed) can sometimes still be accepted as a valid "informal will" if certain criteria are met. The key questions are: Did the deceased intend the document to operate as a will? Was the document clearly intended to dispose of the estate? Did the document demonstrate a genuine testamentary intention? In Peek v Wheatley, the court examined whether the note on the iPhone was created with the intention for it to serve as the deceased’s final testament. The court recognized that while the note contained the deceased’s wishes, it was unclear whether the document was intended to take effect, without more (that is without the will making doing anything else). It was possibly a “working document” or a ‘dry run’ that might be amended later by the will maker or simply a document that he intended to pass on to his solicitor to prepare a will based upon it. The Pitfalls of Informal, Digital Wills This case underscores why relying on informal methods—such as notes on a smartphone—is perilous: Lack of Formalities: A valid will typically requires signatures, witnesses, and clear language. Digital notes often lack these formalities, making their validity uncertain. Ambiguity of Intent: A casual note or message may not conclusively demonstrate the testator’s intention for the document to be their final will, especially if created in a moment of emotion or without legal advice. Potential for Disputes: Informal documents are more easily challenged, leading to costly and time-consuming court disputes, as seen in this case. Risk of Misinterpretation: Digital notes can be vague or incomplete, and their meaning can be misinterpreted, especially if they are not drafted with legal precision. Why You Should Have a Lawyer Prepare a Formal Will The Peek v Wheatley case exemplifies the importance of engaging a qualified lawyer to draft your will. A lawyer ensures that your testamentary wishes are clearly articulated, legally valid, and less susceptible to challenges. They will: Use precise language to avoid ambiguity Follow all legal formalities (signatures, witnesses) Provide advice on estate planning tailored to your circumstances Minimize the risk of intestacy or disputes after death Final Thoughts While it might seem convenient to jot down a quick note on your iPhone or leave a casual message, this approach is fraught with legal uncertainty. The law prefers formal, properly executed documents to ensure your wishes are respected and to minimize disputes among your loved ones.  If you want your estate to be distributed according to your wishes, consult a qualified estate planning lawyer. They will craft a robust, legally sound will that stands up in court and provides peace of mind for you and your family. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For personalised estate planning assistance, please contact a qualified lawyer. Would you like me to help you draft a tailored legal will or provide further information?
By websitebuilder • March 13, 2024
The recent case of Diedler v Borowiec 2023 WASC 396 is perhaps a cautionary tale for those beneficiaries of a doubtful will. The Deceased made a will with the Public Trustee in 2018. At the time he has 97 years old. For all intents and purposes, when the will was prepared, the Deceased appeared to have capacity- he lived independently, drove his own car (!) and managed his own finances. He did not want his step son and his own daughter to benefit from his estate. Following a trial , a judge found that the Deceased suffered from delusions at the time he made the will including a belief that his daughter was a witch, was trying to poison him. That she was practising witchcraft and that she flew through his window and was stealing items form him. In fact there had been concerns about his mental health for a least five years prior to him making the will. Following his death, the Public Trustee obtained medical reports and came to the conclusion that the 2018 will was invalid. However, the beneficiaries of the 2018 will were not happy with that decision and decided to seek proof of it by issuing proceedings in solemn form in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. Having lost the case, the question arose as to who should pay the solicitors costs. The court found that, having regard to the medical evidence, it was unreasonable for the beneficiaries of the 2018 will to have sought to prove it. Several offers of settlement (‘Calderbank Offers’) had been made by the beneficiaries of an earlier (1981) will, all of which had been rejected. The court ordered that the Plaintiffs (the beneficiaries of the 2018 will) pay the Defendants costs on an indemnity basis. Those costs would no doubt be very substantial. Although the person seeking to propound the will may have a honest (bona fide) belief that the will is valid, the belief must also be reasonable. On the facts, with the available medical evidence, the court found that the belief was not reasonable and the Plaintiff should bear not only their own legal costs but also the Defendants. As a point of reference, in the Victorian case of O’Donoghue v Mussett [2008] VSC 63, the Plaintiff’s costs were $250,000 up to the third day of a trial. The Defendant’s costs would be similar, so it becomes a very expensive exercise and not on to be lightly undertaken. If you need advice concerning the validity of a will, contact us now.